High Court allowed petitioners to withdraw three writ petitions challenging income tax decisions with liberty to file fresh petitions. The order dismissed the petitions consequentially.
Permission granted to withdraw writ petitions with liberty to prefer them afresh; petitions dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
WPT No. 245 of 2018
---- Petitioner
Versus
---- Respondent
WPT No. 246 of 2018
---- Petitioner
Versus
---- Respondent
WPT No. 247 of 2018
---- Petitioner
Versus
---- Respondent
For Petitioners Shri Ankit Singhal, Advocate For Respondents Ms. Naushina Afrin Ali, Advocate
Hon'ble Justice Mr. Prashant Kumar Mishra
Order On Board
12/12/2018
Sd/Prashant Kumar Mishra Judge
Nirala
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the learned counsel for the petitioners can seek and obtain permission to withdraw the writ petitions with liberty to prefer them afresh?
M/s Sona Power Private Limited
Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central)
M/s Sona Beverages Private Limited
Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central)
M/s Merigold Impex
Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central)
Prashant Kumar Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
