This order dismissed a writ petition challenging a notification that assigned different pay scales and classifications to Gurhsawar and Sayees posts. The Court held the State is free to classify posts differently despite precedent in Madhya Pradesh.
Writ application is dismissed as the challenge is unsustainable and the notification is valid.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
WPS No. 7393 of 2017
---- Petitioners
Versus
---- Respondents
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------For Petitioners : Shri Alok Kumar Pandey, Advocate For Respondents/ State : Shri YS Thakur, Additional AG
Hon'ble Shri Ajay Kumar Tripathi, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu
Order on Board
Per Ajay Kumar Tripathi, Chief Justice
25.09.2018
Department, Government of Chhattisgarh is being challenged in the
wps 7393 of 2017
2
present Writ application showing two different pay scales for a Horse Rider (Gurhsawar) and an Attender (Sayees), as well as showing them as Class-3 and Class-4 category employees respectively has been assailed.
Sd/- Sd/- (Ajay Kumar Tripathi) (Parth Prateem Sahu) Chief Justice Judge
padma
1 issue framed by the court
Whether State of Chhattisgarh is bound to treat Gurhsawar and Sayees posts equally given similar treatment in Madhya Pradesh.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Santosh Suryvansi
Nageshwar Salam
Firendra Rajak
Govind Kumar
State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary Home Department
Inspector General, Police Headquarter, Chhattisgarh
Ajay Kumar Tripathi
Parth Prateem Sahu
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
