The High Court dismissed a writ petition declaring it infructuous as the petitioner had superannuated due to an enhanced retirement age benefit.
The writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Order Sheet
Writ Petition (S) No. 6647 of 2014
Keshav Prasad Yadav Versus State of Chhattisgarh and others
| 14.11.2018 | Shri Hari Agrawal, counsel for the petitioner. |
|---|---|
| Shri Ali Asgar, counsel for respondents 2 to 4. | |
| In the light of the submission made by the respondents that the petitioner has got the advantage of the enhanced age retirement and has since superannuated, by efflux of time the petition has become infructuous. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed as having become infructuous. |
|
| Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) JUDGE |
Bhola
Keshav Prasad Yadav
State of Chhattisgarh
others
P. Sam Koshy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
