Disposed

Smt. Sita Devi v. State Of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh HC17 Jan 2018WPS/620/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner, a teacher, approached the High Court seeking payment of cherished honorarium of Rs. 400 per month. The court directed the District Officer to consider the representation within two months. The writ petition was disposed of without expressing an opinion on merits.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondent No. 3 to consider and decide the representation within two months from the date of submission.

Smt. Sita Devi Vs State Of Chhattisgarh — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Chhattisgarh HC (2018)

¶1

NAFR

¶2

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

¶3

WPS No. 620 of 2018

¶4

Smt. Sita Devi W/o Shri Sitaram Aged About 42 Years Presently Working As Teacher, Bharda, Block Pratapur, District Surguja Chhattisgarh., District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh

¶5

---- Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Women And Child Development, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

¶8

The Director, Department Of Women And Child Development, Indravati Bhawan, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

¶9

District Women And Child Development Officer, Surajpur, District Surguja Chhattisgarh., District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh

¶10

---- Respondents

¶11

Shri Alok Tiwari, counsel for the petitioner/s. Shri Syed Majid Ali, Dy.G.A. for the State.

¶12

Hon'ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava

¶13

Order On Board

¶14

17/01/2018

¶15

Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is working as Teacher in Shishu Shiksha Kendra, Belpara Korandha, Block - Pratappur, District Surguja. Further, from March 2016 onwards, she is not being paid honorarium of Rs.400/ per month.

¶16

Considering the limited nature of relief claimed in the petition, it is deemed appropriate that on petitioner submitting representation within a period of 15 days from today, respondent No.3 shall consider and decide petitioner's representation regarding claim for honorarium within a period of two months from the date of submission of representation.

¶17

The writ petition stands disposed off.

¶18

It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case and the respondent authorities shall decide the matter, on its own merits, strictly in accordance with law, without treating any observation made in this order as opinion on the merits of the case.

¶19

Sd/-

¶20

(Manindra Mohan Shrivastava) Judge

¶21

Deepti

Smt. Sita Devi v. State Of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt. Sita Devi v. State Of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ramkumar Kashyap Vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Dashi Ram Patel Vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Shivendra Singh Vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Kamlesh Kumar Tamrakar Vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Anant Kumar Sirdar Vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Adil Hasan Vs State Of Chhattisgarh