Nohar Singh Dhruv v. State Of Chhattisgarh
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner sought a writ directing implementation of an outstanding transfer order dated 21.7.2016. Court relied on a prior decision stating that issued transfers must be complied with unless modified, varied, or cancelled. Petitioner was directed to be relieved if the order remained outstanding.
What did the court decide?
The petition was disposed of with a direction that the petitioner be relieved to implement the transfer order if not cancelled, varied, or kept in abeyance.