Disposed

Smt. Jagriti Tiwari v. State of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh HC1 Nov 2018WPS/6016/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Court disposed of a writ petition seeking recognition of past service. It observed that the petitioner requires minimum eight years of service to claim the benefit and directed her to approach departmental authorities after completing the requisite tenure.

What did the court decide?

None granted; petitioner directed to approach authorities upon completing eight years of required service.

Smt. Jagriti Tiwari Vs State of… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Chhattisgarh HC (2018)

¶1

¶2

NAFR

¶3

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) NO.6016 OF 2018

¶4

Smt. Jagriti Tiwari W/o Shri Lalit Kumar Tiwari Aged About 28 Years R/o Shanti Nagar, Ward No.11, Gali No.5, Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh. Presently Posted As Assistant Teacher (Urban), At Government Girls Primary School Dondilohara Lohara, District Durg, Chhattisgarh.

¶5

…Petitioner(s)

¶6

Versus

¶7

1. State of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Urban Administration And Development Department, Mantralaya, Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

¶8

2. Deputy Secretary Urban Administration And Development Department, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

¶9

3. Chief Municipal Officer Nagar Panchayat Dondilohara, District Balod, Chhattisgarh.

¶10

… Respondent(s)

¶11

For Petitioner : Shri Shri Mateen Siddique,Advocate. For Respondent-State : Shri DK Wankhede, Govt. Advocate.

¶12

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy

¶13

Order on Board

¶14

01.11.2018

¶15

1. Defaults pointed out by the Registry for the moment stands ignored and the matter is heard finally with the consent of the parties.

¶16

2. The grievance of the petitioner is non counting of her past service rendered prior to joining of present employment.

¶17

3. The contention of the petitioner is that the matter stands covered by the decision of this court rendered in WPS No.2530 of 2017 (Mukesh Kumar Patel and another Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and another) as also the batch of writ petition disposed of by this court on 27.10.2018, the lead case of which being WPS No.6147 of 2018 (Shabnum Khatun Vs. State of Chhattisgarh & Ors.) and other analogous petitions.

¶18

¶19

4. The counsel appearing for the respondents submit that probably the petitioner as of now does not have minimum required length of service for grant of benefit that she has claimed for which otherwise has not been disputed by the counsel for the petitioner.

¶20

5. Given the facts, the writ petition stands disposed of with an observation that the petitioner on her completing the required length of service of 8 years shall approach the authorities in the department for the relief sought for and the authorities shall consider the same in the light of the decision rendered by this court in the case of similarly placed persons and shall pass an appropriate order.

¶21

6. With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition stands disposed of.

¶22

Sd/(P. Sam Koshy Judge

¶23

inder

Smt. Jagriti Tiwari v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt. Jagriti Tiwari v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Purushottam Patel Vs Divisional Commissioner Durg

Bhudhar Prasad Tiwari Vs Divisional Commissioner Durg

Sangeeta Sinha Vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Mahipal Minj Vs State Of Chhattisgarh

V.K. Singh Bediya Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Vijay Lal Patel Vs Anoop Kumar Shrivastav