The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed the writ petition for want of prosecution due to the petitioner's absence and lack of representation on the dates fixed for hearing.
Writ petition dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Order Sheet
Writ Petition (S) No. 4929 of 2005
Indrasingh Gautam Versus State of MP and others
| None appears for the petitioner. | |
|---|---|
| 22.10.2018 | Shri Majid Ali, Dy. Govt. Advocate for the State. The present writ petition originates when a petition was filed before the State Administrative Tribunal in the year 1992 which subsequently transferred to this High Court on abolition of the State Administrative Tribunal. Today, when the matter was called on two occasions, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. In the absence of any representation on behalf of the petitioner, this Court is left with no other option but to dismiss the petition for want of prosecution. Accordingly, the present writ petition stands dismissed for want of prosecution. |
| Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) JUDGE |
Bhola
Indrasingh Gautam
State of MP
P. Sam Koshy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
