Petitioner challenged a notification retiring him at age 58, claiming retirement age should be 60 for class-III employees. Court held the enhancement was prospective only after 26.05.2011.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 4848 of 2010
Shiv Narayan Shukla, S/o. Shri Nand Kishore Shukla, Aged about 58 years, R/o. C-412, VIP Chowk Sunder Nagar, Raipur, Chhattisgarh
---- Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner : Mr. Bhuvneshwar Singh Rajput, Advocate For State : Mr. Ashutosh Pandey, Panel Lawyer
Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board
03/08/2018
2
Sd/-
(P. Sam Koshy) Judge
Ved
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the notification keeping service conditions same as erstwhile M.P.S.R.T.C. and retiring petitioner at age 58 is legal.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Shiv Narayan Shukla
State of Chhattisgarh
Chhattisgarh Infrastructure Development Corporation
Rajiv Gandhi Rajya Vikas Sansthan
P. Sam Koshy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
