Writ petition filed by a Sub Divisional Officer of PWD regarding a grievance. The application for withdrawal was filed. The court allowed the application and dismissed the petition as withdrawn. An additional liberty to revive was granted.
Withdrawal of the writ petition allowed; petition dismissed with liberty to revive.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
WPS No. 39 of 2012
Vishram Prasad Patel, son of Shrilal Patel, aged about 51 years, Incharge Sub Divisional Officer, Office of P.W.D. Korea Division, Manendragarh, Korea (C.G.)
---- Petitioner
Versus
---- Respondents
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------For Petitioner : Mr. Raghavendra Verma, Advocate. For State : Mr. Majid Ali, Dy. GA For respective : Mr. Akhilesh Kumar & Mr. Ashish Surana, respondents Advocates
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava
Order on Board
07/02/2018
Heard on I. A. No. 8, Application for withdrawal of the writ petition.
Upon due consideration, the application is allowed.
Not opposed.
Therefore, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to revive, in case, grievance of the petitioner is not redressed.
Sd/-
(Manindra Mohan Shrivastava) Judge
Rohit
Vishram Prasad Patel
State Of Chhattisgarh
Manindra Mohan Shrivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
