The Supreme Court Bench, from Chhattisgarh High Court, dismissed a writ petition challenging an order quashing the termination of a substitute Branch Post Master. The Court held that the Tribunal did not create a right to the post, leaving it to the Department to fill the vacancy.
The writ application was dismissed as being devoid of merit.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
WPS No. 3797 of 2018
5. Assistant Superintendent Of Post Office, Sub - Division Korba Chhattisgarh. 495677
---- Petitioner
Versus
---- Respondents
For Petitioners Shri B. Gopa Kumar, ASG For Respondent Shri A. K. Shukla, Advocate
Hon'ble the Chief Justice Mr. Ajay Kumar Tripathi
Hon'ble Justice Mr. Prashant Kumar Mishra
Order On Board
31/07/2018
2
the private respondent and allowed him to continue as a substitute Branch Post Master of Kamrid till a regularly recruited Branch Post Master is appointed for Kamrid.
3
dispense with the services of the private respondent. The ball is in the court of the Postal Department. It is for them to expedite the matter.
Sd/Sd/( Ajay Kumar Tripathi ) ( Prashant Kumar Mishra ) Chief Justice Judge
Nirala
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Writ Court should interfere with the Central Administrative Tribunal's order quashing the termination of a substitute Branch Post Master.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Union of India
Om Prakash Tiwari
Ajay Kumar Tripathi
Prashant Kumar Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
