Disposes of a writ petition challenging rejection of appointment as Shiksha Karmi Grade-III. The High Court held that facts were identical to those in previously dismissed cases.
Petition dismissed on parity with previous judgments (WPS Nos. 6705/2009 and 6228/2009).
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
WPS No. 3601 of 2010
---Petitioners
Versus
---Respondents
For petitioners : Shri Waquar Nayyer, Advocate. For State : Shri Syed Majid Ali, Dy.G.A.
Hon ' ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy
Order on Board
09/08/2018
petitioners for appointment as a Shiksha Karmi Grade-III from among the wait-list candidates for Janpad Panchayat, Abhanpur, District Raipur (C.G.).
2
Writ Petitions decided on 28/02/2011 and subsequently on 07/08/2018 in WPS No. 6705/2009, this Court is of the opinion that the present case also being identical and similar so far as the facts are concerned are liable to be decided in line of parity.
Sd/-
Sumit
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the present writ petition appealing for appointment as Shiksha Karmi Grade-III is liable to be decided in line of parity with identical facts decided in earlier judgments.
Whether the instant writ petition deserves to be dismissed as it is similar to cases already decided.
Mahendra Kashyap
Tulsi Kashyap
Tukesh Sahu
Dinesh Ravlani
State of Chhattisgarh
Collector, District Raipur
P. Sam Koshy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
