Petition dismissed for want of prosecution due to non-appearance of legal representation for the petitioner in a second round.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Order Sheet
WPS No.3153 of 2010
Shukla Prasad & Anr. Vs. State of Chhattisgarh & Anr.
| 17/08/2018 | None for the petitioner. |
|---|---|
| Shri Mazid Ali, Dy. Govt. Advocate for the State. None appears for the petitioner even in second round. In the absence of any representation on behalf of the petitioner, this court is left with no other option but to dismiss the case for want of prosecution. Accordingly, the petition stands dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- |
|
| (P. Sam Koshy) Judge |
Inder
Shukla Prasad & Anr.
State of Chhattisgarh & Anr.
P. Sam Koshy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
