Hon'ble Justice P. Sam Koshy allowed the writ petition, granting the petitioner two advance increments based on D.Ed. qualification obtained on cost, following a prior High Court decision.
Two advance increments on account of D.Ed. qualification obtained on own cost.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Writ Petition (S) No. 2784 of 2013
Shiv Shekhar Singh, aged about 49 years, son of late Shri Kishori Singh, working as Upper Division Teacher, Government Boys Higher Secondary School, Manendragarh, District Koria (CG)
---- Petitioner
Versus
---- Respondents
For Petitioner : Shri D. N. Prajapati, Advocate For State : Shri Chandresh Shrivastava, P.L.
Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy
Order On Board
10.10.2018
The claim of the petitioner in the present writ petition is for a direction
to the respondents for grant of two advance increments on his having obtained the qualification of D.Ed. on 01.03.1999 on his own cost.
2. Counsel for the parties make a fair statement that the issue involved
in the instant case stands already decided in a bunch of writ petitions by
2
this High Court in WPS No. 3793/2013 and other analogous petitions decided on 06.12.2013 and which has also been affirmed by the Division Bench in Writ Appeal No.105/2014 decided on 04.04.2014.
3. Given the said fact that the issue involved in the present writ petition stands already adjudicated upon by the Single Bench as well as by the Division Bench and on perusal of the records it is revealed that the petitioner has obtained D.Ed. Qualification in 1999 on his own cost, the petitioner would also be entitled for the same benefit as has been granted to the petitioners in the aforementioned writ petitions.
4. Accordingly, the present writ petition also stands allowed in similar terms as has been decided in WPS 3739/2013 on 06.12.2013 with other bunch of petitions and the petitioner would be entitled for all consequential benefits.
5. The writ petition thus stands allowed. Needless to mention that the relief so granted shall be subject to verification of the facts and comparing the claim of the petitioner at par with the petitioners in the aforementioned writ petitions.
Sd/P. Sam Koshy Judge
Khatai
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a teacher who obtained D.Ed. qualification on own cost is entitled to two advance increments.
Shiv Shekhar Singh
State Of Chhattisgarh
P. Sam Koshy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
