Writ petition regarding withdrawal of increment due to lack of B.Ed/D.Ed examination. Court disposed of the petition directing respondents to examine the petitioner's claim as per previous order in Jayant Kumar Patle case.
Direction to respondents to examine petitioner's claim in terms of order dated 03.11.2017 in Jayant Kumar Patle case.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
WPS No. 234 of 2018
Kamleshwar Sharma S/o Shri Ghanshyam Sharma, Aged About 32 Years Presently Working As Lecturer Panchayat At Govt. High School, Chourenga, Block Simga, District Balodabazar - Bhatapara Chhattisgarh.
---- Petitioner
Versus
---- Respondents
Shri CJK Rao, counsel for the petitioner/s. Shri Chandresh Shrivastava, Panel Lawyer for the State.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava
Order On Board
10/01/2018
Heard.
examined after affording opportunity of hearing in terms of order dated 03.11.2017 passed in the case of Jayant Kumar Patle (supra).
Sd/- SD/- (Manindra Mohan Shrivastava) Judge
Deepti
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner's claim regarding the withdrawal of increment can be examined.
Directions to be issued for affording proper opportunity of hearing before deciding the matter.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Jayant Kumar Patle vs. State of ChhattisgarhReferred¶17
Jayant Kumar Patle vs. State of Chhattisgarh (WPS No.4271 of 2017 and batch of petitions, vide order dated 03.11.2017)
Kamleshwar Sharma
State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Panchayat And Rural Development
Commissioner - Cum - Director, Directorate Of Panchayat
Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat, Balodabazar
Manindra Mohan Shrivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
