Dismissed
Smt. Santwana Lal v. State of Chhattisgarh and Anr.
Chhattisgarh HCWPS/2290/2009
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
Injthe Hon'ble Hieh Court of Chhattishsarh…
What the court decided
AI extract
Injthe Hon'ble Hieh Court of Chhattishsarh…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(^ i &^/<7
Injthe Hon'ble Hieh Court of Chhattishsarh at Bilaspur (C.G.}
W.P.(S) No. §0^0 200^
Petitioner
Smt. Sanfwana Lal aged 44 years WifeofSudhirial
Resident ofQuarter No.E Block No.13,
Street-9, Sector - 5, Bhilamagar, QsiH-r^-w^'
Versus
Respondents ...
':3V^^^1 Panchayatand GraminVikash Vibhag ^ ...-^..^'^ Ministry, D.K.S.Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.) ".•,;^r6v?i^ ..-•••" 2. ChiefExecutive Officer, .-^y}""' ^'^ Janpada Panchayat, Diirg (C.G.) 9< A. fftt' Writ petitipn under Article 226 ofthe Constitufion of India for issuance ofWrit Of mandamus/direction or any other appropriate writ.
^ r- i-i
Ae
^
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Order Sheet
WPS No. 2290 of 2009
Smt. Santwana Lal Versus State of Chhattisgarh & Anr.
07.08.2018 None appears for the petitioner when the matter is called on two
occassions.
In the absence of any represenfation on behalf of the petitioner, this
Court is left with no other option but to dismiss the petition for want of
prosectuion.
Accordingly, the instant Writ Petition stands dismissed for want of
prosecution.
Sd/-
P. Sam Koshy
Judge
Sumit
Smt. Santwana Lal
State of Chhattisgarh
P. Sam Koshy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court