Writ petition dismissed for want of prosecution as the petitioner failed to appear for hearing in any of the two rounds called by the court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Writ Petition (S) No.2011 of 2007
Chatt Lal Bhaskar, aged about 36 years, S/o Raja Ram Bhaskar, Posted as Steno Typist, at O/o Sub Divisional Officer, Water Resources Sub Division, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, R/o Krishna Nagar, Bilaspur (CG).
---- Petitioner
Versus
---- Respondents
For Petitioner : None present. For State : Ms. Sunita Jain, Panel Lawyer
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sharad Kumar Gupta Order On Board
2
26/07/2018
(1) When the matter is called for hearing, none present for the petitioner in both the rounds. No representation is made.
(2) In these circumstances, this Court has left with no other option but to dismiss the petition for want of prosecution.
(3) Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Sd/- (Sharad Kumar Gupta) Judge
L/-
Chatt Lal Bhaskar
State of Chhattisgarh
Sharad Kumar Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
