Disposed

Ku. Kalpana Sahu v. State of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh HC31 Jan 2018WPS/1003/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Chhattisgarh, in WPS No. 1003 of 2018, ordered respondents to examine the petitioner's pay scale claim according to a previous court order and disposed of the petition with directions for appropriate decision-making.

What did the court decide?

Respondents to examine petitioner's case per order in Jayant Kumar Patle and decide on claim for reinstatement to earlier pay scale.

Ku. Kalpana Sahu Vs State of Chhattisgarh — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Chhattisgarh HC (2018)

¶1

¶2

NAFR

¶3

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

¶4

WPS No. 1003 of 2018

¶5

Ku. Kalpana Sahu D/o Shri Teekaram Sahu Aged About 32 Years By Occupation Lecturere Panchayat, Govt. H. S. School Kusmi, Block Palari, District- Balodabazar, Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh., District : Balodabazar-Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh

¶6

---- Petitioner

¶7

Versus

¶8

State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Panchayat And Rural Department, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattgisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

¶9

Commissioner- Cum- Director, Panchayat, Sanchanalaya, Naya Raipur, DistrictRaipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

¶10

Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat, District- Baloda Bazar- Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh., District : Balodabazar-Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh -- Respondents

¶11

For Petitioner : Mr. Parag Kotecha, Advocate For State : Mr. Majid Ali,Dy. G.A.

¶12

Hon'ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava

Order On Board

31.01.2018

Heard.

Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner was recruited under the Chhattisgarh Shiksha Karmi (Appointment and Service) Rule, 2007 and she was granted regular pay scale, increment and then revised pay scale also, but now in view of the circular dated 06-05-2016 and 08-03-2017, her pay scale has been brought to the minimum of the pay scale applicable to Lecturer (Panchayat). He submits that this issue was examined by this Court in the case of Jayant Kumar Patle vs. State of Chhattisgarh (WPS No.4271 of 2017 and batch of petitions, vide order dated 03-11-2017) and various directions have been issued.

¶17

Learned State counsel would submit that this Court issued directions for examination of cases category wise.

¶18

¶19

Considering the aforesaid submission, the respondents shall examine the petitioner's case in terms of order passed by this Court in the case of Jayant Kumar Patle vs. State of Chhattisgarh (WPS No.4271 of 2017 and batch of petitions, vide order dated 03-11-2017) and take appropriate decision on petitioner's claim for reinstatement into the earlier pay scale, which was being granted to the petitioner prior to reduction of lowest stage of the pay scale of Lecturer (Panchayat).

¶20

With the aforesaid observation, this petition is finally disposed off.

¶21

Sd/-

¶22

(Manindra Mohan Shrivastava) Judge

¶23

Rekha

Ku. Kalpana Sahu v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ku. Kalpana Sahu v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pt. Ravishankar Shukla University Vs Janki Prasad Sharma

Khudiram Chakrabarty Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Chetan Kumar Chandrakar Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Bajrang Shrivas Vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Narendra Kurrey Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Rohit Kumar Chandrakar Vs State of Chhattisgarh