In a Wakf Public Interest Litigation filed by a petitioner who is an elected Councillor, the High Court noted potential illegalities by a Cooperative Society but held that such matters should be addressed by statutory authorities, not through PIL. The petition was disposed of due to these observations.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
WPPIL No. 145 of 2017
Versus
---- Respondents
| ---------------------------------------- For Petitioner |
----------------------------------------------------------- : Shri Animesh Verma, Advocate |
|---|---|
| For Respondents/State | : Shri AS Kachhawaha, Additional AG |
| For Respondent- 3 | : Shri Anup Majumdar, Advocate |
Hon'ble Shri Ajay Kumar Tripathi, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu
Order on Board
Per Ajay Kumar Tripathi, Chief Justice
09.10.2018
wppil 145 of 2017
2
before various courts which include Civil and Criminal courts. The statutory authorities have to take action in this regard for which the petitioner has leeway and liberty.
Sd/- Sd/- (Ajay Kumar Tripathi) (Parth Prateem Sahu) Chief Justice Judge
padma
Dr. D. Bharti
The State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Revenue
The State of C. G. Through Secretary, Department Of Urban Administration And Development
The Municipal Corporation Bhilai
The Collector, District Durg
The Sub - Divisional Officer, District Durg
Ajay Kumar Tripathi
Parth Prateem Sahu
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
