The High Court, Chhattisgarh dismissed the writ petition by relying on rules from a previous order concerning lack of valid grounds for non-appearance and failure to comply with pre-deposit requirements.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Writ Petition (L) No. 4900 of 2011
M/s P.D. Bidi Company, through power of attorney holder of partners, Prem Kumar Yadav, S/o Maikulal Yadav, aged about 62 years, R/o Bastar Road, Dhamtari, Tahsil & District Dhamtari (C.G.)
---- Petitioners
Versus
---- Respondents
For Petitioners : Shri S.S. Baghel, Advocate. For Respondents : None.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal
Order On Board
19/04/2018
(1) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that issue involved in this writ petition is identical to the order passed by this Court in Writ Petition (L) No. 4898 of 2011 {M/s P.D. Bidi Company Vs. Appellate Authority under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972}, decided on 02.01.2018 , therefore, instant writ petition may be disposed of in terms of paragraph 5 of the aforesaid order, which read as under:-
“ 5. On merits, the Petitioner has not furnished any valid ground for not appearing despite service of notice. The opportunity to assail the ex-parte order was also wasted away by not complying with the statutory requirement of pre-deposit. The Court finds no reason to interfere. An identical Writ Petition (L) No. 4897 of 2011 has also been decided by this court vide order dated 21.01.2016, wherein similar view has been taken.”
2
(2) Accepting the submissions made by learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed in terms of paragraph 5 of the order passed by this Court in Writ
Petition (L) No.4898 of 2011 {M/s P.D. Bidi Company Ltd. (supra)}
Sd/-
(Sanjay K. Agrawal)
Judge
D/-
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
M/s P.D. Bidi Company Vs. Appellate Authority under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972Followed¶16
W.P. (L) No. 4898 of 2011
vide order dated 21.01.2016Referred¶17
W.P. (L) No. 4897 of 2011
1 provisions across 1 enactments
M/s P.D. Bidi Company
Appellate Authority under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972
In-charge Deputy Labour Commissioner, Chhattisgarh
Controlling Authority and Assistant Labour Commissioner, Raipur
Shiv Kumar
Sanjay K. Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
