In absence of representation by petitioners on multiple dates, the High Court dismissed the writ petition for want of prosecution and vacated interim relief.
Writ petition dismissed for want of prosecution; interim relief vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Writ Petition (L) No. 2278 of 2009
2
21.Kailana Fantaiaya 22.Giri Govind Rao 23.Kailna Appala Naidu 24.G. Venkat Ramna 25.G. Venkat Ramna 26.Pundurutu Sheckher 27.Ali Beli Anji 28.P. Sini Rama Rao 29. Gaiti Apparao 30.Gara Simhachalam
31.Gara Govindu
(through authorized person - Gara Govindu S/o Dalpadu : present address – C/o Prahlad Manikpuri, Potiakala, Kasaridih, Durg (CG)
---- Respondents
For Petitioners : None For Respondents : Shri V. G. Tamaskar, Advocate
Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order On Board
05/02/2018
There was no representation on behalf of the petitioners either in person or through their lawyer even when the matter was called on repeated occasions.
2. In the absence of any representation on behalf of the petitioners, this Court is left with no other option but to dismiss the petition for want of prosecution.
3. Accordingly, the present writ petition stands dismissed for want of prosecution.
4. As a result of dismissal of the petition, the interim relief granted by this Court also stands vacated.
Sd/- ( P. Sam Koshy) JUDGE
Bhola
H.S. Narula
M.S. Narula
D.S. Construction Company
Anand Narula
Balbir Singh
D.S. Vicon Ventures Private Ltd.
P. Sam Koshy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
