The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed W.P.(C) No. 927 of 2013 for want of prosecution due to the non-appearance of the petitioner and lack of any representation or response from their side.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Order Sheet
W.P.(C) No. 927 of 2013
Durga Swayam Sahayta Samuh, Through Its President Shree Bai, W/o. Kalam Sai, R/o. Village Badrika Ashram, Gram Panchayat Pasta, Block Ramanujnagar, P.S. Ramanujnagar, Distt Surajpur, Chhattisgarh
….... Petitioner
…....Respondents
05.07.2018 None for the Petitioner. Mr. Arun Sao, Dy. A.G. for the State. Even in the second call, none appears nor any representation is made on behalf of the petitioner, therefore, the Court has no other option except to dismiss the case for want of prosecution. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/Li (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge Ashok
Durga Swayam Sahayta Samuh, Through Its President Shree Bai
State Of Chhattisgarh, Through Collector, Surajpur
Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Ramanujnagar
Sita Mahila Swa Sahayata Samuh
Sanjay K. Agrawal
Ashok
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
