Writ petition challenging the rejection of an RTI application by the Second Appeal Authority and State Information Commission, which found no FIR existed regarding wood stealing. Held factually well-founded and meritless.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
WPC No. 81 of 2012
Versus
For Petitioners : Mr. Bharat Rajput, Advocate. For Respondents : Mr. S.S. Tekchandani, Advocate. For State : Mr. D. R. Minj, Dy. G. A.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal
Order On Board
09/07/18
Sd/-
(Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge
Priyanka
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the writ court should disturb the factual finding that no FIR was lodged regarding stealing of wood.
Whether the correctness of information supplied by the Information Commission can be challenged in writ proceedings.
Whether the petitioners application seeking information under RTI Act 2005 was properly dismissed.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Kamla Bai And Anr.
State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary Department Of Home
Superintendent Of Police, Durg
Sub- Divisional Officer Police, Bemetara
Additional Tahsildar, Thana Khamharia
Police Station, Thana Khamharia
Sanjay K. Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
