Single judge order where the petitioner sought liberty to withdraw the writ application. The High Court dismissed the application as withdrawn with liberty to file afresh if cause of action arises.
Writ application dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file afresh if cause of action arises.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
WPC No. 481 of 2015
---- Petitioner
Versus
---- Respondents
__________________________________________________________________ For Petitioner : Shri Ashish Shrivastava, Advocate For Respondent/UOI : Shri Vaibhav P. Shukla, Standing Counsel For Respondent/State : Shri Prafull N. Bharat, Additional Advocate General
Hon'ble Shri Ajay Kumar Tripathi, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge
Order on Board
Per, Ajay Kumar Tripathi, Chief Justice
30.10.2018
Sd/Sd/- (Ajay Kumar Tripathi) (Parth Prateem Sahu) Chief Justice Judge
Chandra
Nuvoco Vistas Corporation Limited
Union of India
State of Chhattisgarh
Ajay Kumar Tripathi
Parth Prateem Sahu
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
