Writ petitioner challenging rejection of tender document due to missing annexure. Court found email compliance submitted to wrong addresses did not meet notice requirements. Writ application dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
WPC No. 2726 of 2018
---- Petitioner
Versus
---- Respondents
For Petitioner : Shri Keshav Kumar Gupta, Advocate For Respondent No.2 : Shri C.J.K. Rao, Advocate.
Hon'ble Shri Ajay Kumar Tripathi, CJ Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu,J
Order on Board
Per Ajay Kumar Tripathi, CJ
03/10/2018
annexed. From perusal of Annexure P-4 one thing which emerges is that so-called compliance dated 3.9.2018 by email is not on email address indicated in the information given to the petitioner. Surprisingly, the communication has been made on three different email addresses but none of them is the address on which rectification was required to be made.
Sd/Sd/(Ajay Kumar Tripathi) (Parth Prateem Sahu) Chief Justice Judge
roshan/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether petitioner's email submission dated 3.9.2018 constituted valid compliance with notice dated 1.9.2018 requiring rectification on a specific email address.
M/s Pushkar Pharma
State Of Chhattisgarh
Chhattisgarh Medical Services Corporation Limited
Ajay Kumar Tripathi
Parth Prateem Sahu
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
