Meghram v. State Of Chhattisgarh and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner argued writ petition became infructuous per State's return. Single-line order disposed of the matter accordingly without cost.
Petitioner argued writ petition became infructuous per State's return. Single-line order disposed of the matter accordingly without cost.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
WPC NO.20 of 2014
Meghram, son of Shri Ramlal, aged about 50 years, Director, Jila Sahkari Krishi Aur Gramin Vikas Bank Maryadit, G.E. Road, Raipur, Post and Thana Maudhapara, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh
----Petitioner
Versus
1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through the Secretary, Co-operative Department, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, Thana Mandir Hasod, Post Office Mandir Hasod, District Raipur, Chhattisarh
---- Respondents
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------For Petitioner : Mr.Amrito Das, Advocate For State : Mr.Anand Dadariya, Dy.G.A.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order on Board
19/07/2018
(Sanjay K.Agrawal)
B/-
Meghram
State Of Chhattisgarh
Sanjay K. Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court