Disposed

Mohd. Siddique v. Smt. Asha Nadam

Chhattisgarh HC18 May 2018WPC/1432/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a writ petition challenging an eviction order under the Chhattisgarh Rent Control Act, 2011, the High Court disposed of the matter by keeping the eviction in abeyance for six weeks due to the petitioner's lack of resources and summer vacation listings. The court clarified this did not affect the merits.

What did the court decide?

The eviction order is to remain in abeyance for a period of six weeks from today.

Mohd. Siddique Vs Smt. Asha Nadam — Landlord and Tenant | Chhattisgarh HC (2018)

¶1

¶2

NAFR

¶3

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

¶4

WPC No. 1432 of 2018

¶5

1. Mohd. Siddique S/o Mohd. Gaffar, Aged About 68 Years R/o. Near Main Road Gandhi Putla, Ward No. 34, Juna Bilaspur, Old High Court Road, In front Of Khanduja Hospital, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh.

¶6

---- Petitioner

¶7

Versus

¶8

Smt. Asha Nadam W/o. Late C.S. Lalit, Aged About 57 Years

¶9

Sunil Nadam, S/o. Late C.S. Lalit Nadam, Aged About 33 Years

¶10

Respondents No.1 & 2 are R/o. Near Main Road Gandhi Putla, Ward No. 34, Juna Bilaspur, Old High Court Road, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh.

¶11

3. Smt. C.G. Ritu, W/o. C.H. Gonal, Aged About 36 Years R/o. 2-2297, Kishanpura, Hanamkunda, Warangal (Telangana), 500 601

¶12

---- Respondent

¶13

For Petitioner

¶14

Shri Surfaraj Khan, Advocate

¶15

Hon'ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra

¶16

Hon'ble Shri Justice Ram Prasanna Sharma

¶17

Order On Board

¶18

¶19

Shri Prashant Kumar Mishra J.

¶20

18/05/2018

¶21

Heard.

¶22

Shri Surfaraj Khan, learned counsel for the petitioner would demonstrate extreme urgency in the matter due to which the petitioner is compelled to prefer the instant writ petition.

¶23

¶24

Under Section 13 of the Chhattisgarh Rent Control Act, 2011 the order under challenge is appealable before the Supreme court. However, the appellant would demonstrate lack of resources for immediately moving the Supreme Court. It is also highlighted that due to ensuing summer vacation, there may be some difficulty in getting the matter listed, therefore, some breathing period may be allowed to the petitioner.

¶25

Considering the submission, the writ petition is disposed of with observation that for a period of 6 weeks from today, the order of eviction shall remain in abeyance.

¶26

It is made clear that this order shall not be construed to be an opinion on the merits of the case neither it would be permissible for the petitioner to claim equity on the basis of this interim order.

¶27

Certified copy today.

¶28

Sd/Sd/Judge Judge Prashant Kumar Mishra Ram Prasanna Sharma

¶29

Akhilesh

Mohd. Siddique v. Smt. Asha Nadam

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mohd. Siddique v. Smt. Asha Nadam

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Commissioner, Central Excise, Customs and Service Tax Vs M/s Jindal Steel and Power Ltd.

M/s Kishan Lal and Company Vs Additional Commissioner Of Commercial Tax

M/s Kishan Lal and Company Vs Additional Commissioner Of Commercial Tax

Akhilesh Singh Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Smt. Shobha Gupta Vs Virendra Kumat Gupta

Anil Tamboli Vs State of Chhattisgarh