Writ petition challenged dismissal of an application to call an advocate witness through court intervention. Court held delay not enormous as report already on record and granted application.
Application under Order 16 Rule 1(3) of C.P.C. allowed; proposed witness called through court intervention on next date.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
W.P.(227) No. 481 of 2018
Versus
Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri
Order On Board
18.05.2018
Heard
2
Sd/- (Goutam Bhaduri) Judge
Ashok
2 issues framed by the court
Whether theapplication under Order 16 Rule 1(3) of C.P.C filing to call an advocate witness is allowabledespite dismissal of earlier application.
Whether the delay in filing the application was so belated as to warrant its dismissal.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sunil Pathak
Anil Pathak
Anjali Pathak
State Of Chhattisgarh
Nazul Officer
Nayab Tehsildar
Goutam Bhaduri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
