This single-page order dismissed an appeal regarding rehabilitation policy clauses declared ultravires, finding the direction to consider the private respondent's case was not bad in law.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
WA No. 400 of 2017
Versus
---- Respondents
| ------------------------------------------ | --------------------------------------------------------- |
|---|---|
| For Appellant | : Shri Kishore Bhaduri and Shri Vaibhav Shukla, Advocates |
| For Respondent- 1 | : Shri Ajay Shrivastava, Advocate |
| For Respondents- 2 and 3 | : Shri UNS Deo, Government Advocate |
Hon'ble Shri Ajay Kumar Tripathi, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu
Judgment on Board
Per Ajay Kumar Tripathi, Chief Justice 06.10.2018
wa 400 of 2017
2
Sd/- Sd/- (Ajay Kumar Tripathi) (Parth Prateem Sahu) Chief Justice Judge
padma
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Smt Sadhna Bai Vs State of Chhattisgarh and others (WPS No.1762 of 2014)Followed¶16
N. M. D. C. Iron And Steel Plant Through The Managing Director
Limbati Wife of Dhaniram
State of Chhattisgarh
Sub Divisional Officer Revenue , Jagdalpur
Ajay Kumar Tripathi
Parth Prateem Sahu
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
