The High Court of Chhattisgarh allowed Interim Application No.01 of 2018 and dismissed Tax Appeal No. 20 of 2017 as not pressed for the reasons indicated in the said application with a prayer for withdrawal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
TAXC No. 20 of 2017
Commissioner, Central Excise, Customs And Service Tax Raipur Chhattisgarh
---- Appellant
Versus
M/s Shri Nakoda Ispat Limited Plot No.109, Phase-II, Siltara Industrial Growth Centre, Siltara, Raipur, Chhattisgarh
---- Respondent For Appellant : Shri Vinay Pandey, Advocate. For Respondent : Shri Abhyuday Singh, Advocate.
Hon'ble Shri Ajay Kumar Tripathi, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge
Order on Board
26/10/2018
Per Ajay Kumar Tripathi, Chief Justice
I.A. No.01 of 2018 is allowed. The appeal is dismissed as not pressed for
the reasons indicated in the said I.A. with a prayer for withdrawal.
Sd/Sd/(Ajay Kumar Tripathi) (Parth Prateem Sahu) CHIEF JUSTICE JUDGE
Anu
Commissioner, Central Excise, Customs And Service Tax Raipur Chhattisgarh
M/s Shri Nakoda Ispat Limited
Ajay Kumar Tripathi
Parth Prateem Sahu
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
