No. 1 Ku. Arti Yadav. The conduct of the plaintiff, therefore, shows that he is the father of defendant No. 1 Ku. Arti Yadav, else he would have immediately approached the concerned authorities in this regard. Moreover, the plaintiff has not even applied for DNA test in order to prove the said fact or to rebut the said certificate. Contrarily, the defendants have produced prima facie materials on record as evidenced by the said Birth Certificate coupled with their oral statements showing that defendant No. 1 is plaintiff's daughter. In absence of any rebuttal, it is difficult to hold that defendant No. 1 Ku. Arti Yadav is not his daughter. Consequently, the lower appellate Court, upon considering all the material documentary evidence as well as oral statements made by the parties, has rightly come to the conclusion that plaintiff Girish Kumar Sahu is the father of defendant No. 1 Ku. Arti Yadav. This fact is a pure finding of fact arrived at after due and proper appreciation of the evidence led by the parties. The findings so recorded therefore, do not require to be interfered and therefore, the same deserve to be and are hereby affirmed.
