The High Court of Chhattisgarh rejected an MCRCA petition on the grounds that it was withdrawn by the applicant's counsel.
MCRCA rejected as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
MCRCA No. 565 of 2018
Dipak Chandravanshi S/o Vishwambhar Das Chandravanshi Aged About 45 Years R/o Village Koni, Police Station Koni, District Bilaspur CG
---- Applicant
Versus
---- Non-applicant
For applicant Mr. Amarnath Pandey, Adv. For State Ms. Sunita Jain, Panel Lawyer.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sharad Kumar Gupta
Order On Board
31-7-2018
Sd/(Sharad Kumar Gupta) Judge
pathak
Dipak Chandravanshi
Sharad Kumar Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
