Single order disposing of two MCRCA bail applications (No. 542 & 564 of 2018) filed against the same crime under Section 498-A IPC. The High Court of Chhattisgarh relying on Supreme Court precedents granted anticipatory bail.
Anticipatory bail granted; release on executing personal bond of Rs. 25,000 each with one surety.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.1
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
MCRCA No. 542 of 2018
---- Applicants
Versus
---- Respondent
&
Page No.2
MCRCA No. 564 of 2018
---- Applicant
Versus
---- Respondent
__________________________________________________________ For Applicants : Mr. T.K. Jha, Advocate. For Respondent/State : Mrs. Smita Ghai, Panel Lawyer.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant Order On Board
03/08/2018
Page No.3
complainant took place on 8.7.2016. Since July, 2017 the complainant is residing in her parental home and after passing of about 6 months she filed a written complaint in the police station on that basis FIR has been lodged. The attempts of counseling made by the counseling Committee of the District police have failed because the complainant herself has not taken any interest. It is also submitted that totally false allegations have been made by the complainant and there is no specific allegation about demand of dowry against the applicants. Hence, it is prayed that applicants be granted anticipatory bail.
Page No.4
applicants should be benefited with grant of anticipatory bail.
Sd/-
(Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant) Judge
Nisha
2 issues framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to applicants apprehending arrest under Section 498-A IPC.
Whether the Supreme Court's observations in Arnesh Kumar and Rajesh Sharma make this a fit case for bail.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Arnesh Kumar Vs. State of BiharRelied on¶32
Arnesh Kumar Vs. State of Bihar (2014) 8 SCC 273 · Who else cites this
Rajesh Sharma Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and OthersRelied on¶32
Rajesh Sharma Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and Others (2017) 8 SCC 787 · Who else cites this
Basant Saraf and others
State Of Chhattisgarh
Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
