The Chhattisgarh High Court allowed the withdrawal of an anticipatory bail application filed by the applicant, dismissing it as infructous.
Permission to withdraw the bail application granted and the application dismissed as infructous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Order Sheet
M.CR.C.(A). No. 329 of 201 8
Lakhan Dewangan S/o Shri Dukhu Dewangan Aged About 65 Years Occupation Labour, R/o Ward No. 03, Dangadipra, Bagbahara P. S. And Tahsil Bagbahara, Dist. Mahasamund Chhattisgarh
---- Applicant
Versus
State Of Chhattisgarh Through P. S. Bagbahara, Dist. Mahasamund Chhattisgarh.
---- Respondent
| 06/07/2018 | Mr. R.S. Patel, counsel for the applicant. Mr. Anant Bajpai, Panel Lawyer for the State. Heard. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the instant bail application has now become infructous and seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the same. It is ordered as prayed for. Accordingly, the bail application filed under Section 438 of Cr.P.C. is dismissed as having become infructous. Sd/- (Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant) Judge |
|---|---|
| balram |
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Lakhan Dewangan
State Of Chhattisgarh Through P. S. Bagbahara
Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
