The High Court of Chhattisgarh rejected a first bail application under Section 439 CrPC lodged under Section 20(B) NDPS Act, citing the seriousness of the alleged offence and its potential impact on society, despite the lack of criminal antecedents for the applicant.
Application under Section 439 CrPC rejected. Bail not granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
MCRC No. 6799 of 2018
Devesh Singh Rajput S/o Vijay Singh Rajput Aged About 21 Years R/o Ward No. 12 Near Dagpiya Talab Kumhari, Thana Kumhari, DistrictDurg Chhattishgarh, District : Durg, Chhattisgarh .
---- Applicant
Versus
State Of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer, Police StationKhallari, District- Mahasamund Chhattishgarh, District : Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh.
---- Respondent
For the Applicant : Shri Vikas Pradhan, Advocate For the State : Shri R.K. Pandey, Panel Lawyer ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hon'ble Shri Justice Sharad Kumar Gupta
Order On Board
14/11/2018
2
Sd/- (Sharad Kumar Gupta) Judge
Kamde
3 issues framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted to the applicant charged under Section 20(B) of the NDPS Act.
Whether the allegation of vitiated investigation due to the informant and I.O. being the same person entitles the applicant to bail at this stage.
Whether the seriousness of the offence justifies rejection of bail despite lack of criminal antecedents.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Devesh Singh Rajput
State Of Chhattisgarh
Sharad Kumar Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
