Allowed

Sunil and Ors. v. State of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh HC25 Oct 2018MCRC/6382/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of a bail application filed by four accused persons in a robbery case. The court allowed the application, directing release on bail upon furnishing sureties and a personal bond, citing lack of flight risk and no antecedents.

What did the court decide?

Bail allowed; applicants to furnish two solvent sureties of Rs. 25,000/- each and one personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- to the satisfaction of the trial Court before release.

Sunil and Ors. Vs State of Chhattisgarh — Cheating and Forgery | Chhattisgarh HC (2018)

¶1

¶2

NAFR

¶3

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

¶4

MCRC No. 6382 of 2018

¶5

Sunil S/o Bhuneshwar, Aged About 20 Years

¶6

Dhandev S/o Muneshwar, Aged About 19 Years

¶7

Lalmohan S/o Birbal, Aged About 31 Years

¶8

Shivkumar S/o Jahru, Aged About 37 Years Caste Routiya,

¶9

All R/o Vill. Raitoli Gatibuda, Police Station Tapkara, District Jashpur Chhattisgarh.

¶10

---- Applicant s

¶11

Versus

¶12

State Of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer, Police Station Tapkara, District Jashpur Chhattisgarh.

¶13

---- Respondent

¶14

For the Applicant For the State

¶15

: Shri A.K. Shukla, Advocate : Shri Sumeet Jhawar, Panel Lawyer

¶16

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sharad Kumar Gupta

¶17

Order On Board

¶18

25/10/2018

¶19

This is the first bail application under Section 439 of the CrPC and there is no bail application is pending before any other Court.

¶20

Perused the case diary provided by the counsel for the State in connection with the Crime No.43/2018 registered at Police Station Tapkara, District Jashpur (C.G.) for the offence punishable under Section 394 read with Section 34 of IPC.

¶21

Case of the prosecution, in brief is that complainant Lalbabu was driver of the vehicle No. C.G.15 DF 3009. He was going from Odisa to Ambikapur on 16/07/2018 transporting the coal. Near village Kasjora four persons having iron instrument tried to stop said vehicle and attempted to commit the robe cash from the said complainant. During investigation said complainant identified applicant No.1 Sunil. On the

¶22

¶23

memorandum of applicants some instruments have been seized from them.

¶24

Learned counsel for the applicants submits that applicants are innocent and falsely implicated in the present case, therefore, they shall be released on bail.

¶25

On the other hand, learned counsel for the State opposes the bail application. He further submits that there is no antecedents against the applicants.

¶26

Looking to the above mentioned facts and circumstances of the case, looking to the fact that there is no likelihood of the accused to abscond and tamper the evidence, the trial will take its own time, this Court is inclined to give the benefit of Section 439 of the Cr.P.C. to the present applicants.

¶27

Consequently, the bail application filed under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C., is allowed. It is ordered that if the applicants furnishes two solvent sureties each for a sum of Rs. 25,000/- along with one personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- to the satisfaction of the trial Court concerned with the condition that he will not involve themselves in any of the crime in future, they be released on bail.

¶28

Certified copy as per rules.

¶29

Sd/- (Sharad Kumar Gupta) Judge

¶30

Kamde

Sunil and Ors. v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sunil and Ors. v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Karia @ Shiv Kumar Vs State of M. P. Now C. G.

Nirmal Dhaneliya Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Najim Ansari Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Pelka Telegu Vs State

Nitish Suryawanshi Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Rohit Rameshwar Sigan Vs State of Chhattisgarh