Hareram v. State of Chhattisgarh
Case brief
What is this about?
Bail application dismissed for want of prosecution due to the applicant's consistent absence when the matter was called.
Bail application dismissed for want of prosecution due to the applicant's consistent absence when the matter was called.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
MCRC No. 6219 of 2018
---- Applicant
Versus
---- Non-applicant
For Applicant : None. For Non-applicant : Shri Sumit Jhanwar, Panel Lawyer
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sharad Kumar Gupta
Order On Board
22.11.2018
Sd/-
(Sharad Kumar Gupta) JUDGE
kishore
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Hareram S/o. Dayanath Prasad
Sharad Kumar Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court