In this bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. involving offences under Sections 354 and 456 IPC, the High Court of Chhattisgarh, considering the night-time entry into the victim's house, rejected the bail plea.
Bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is rejected; Applicant remains in custody.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR M.Cr.C No.3575 of 2018
Ramesh Mahilane S/o Chetan Mahilane Aged About 38 Years R/o Village Durug, O.P. Beladula, P.S. Sarsiva, District- Balodabazar-Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh., District : Balodabazar-Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh
---- Applicant
Versus
State Of Chhattisgarh Through- The Station House Officer, P.S. Sarsiva, O.P. Beladula, District- Balodabazar-Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh., District : Balodabazar-Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh
---- Non-Applicant
For Applicant: Shri Amiyakant Tiwari, Advocate. For State/Non-Applicant: Shri Anant Bajpai, Panel Lawyer.
Single Bench: Hon'ble Shri Sanjay Agrawal, J Order On Board
10.09.2018
2
caught hold of the Applicant. However, somehow, the Applicant managed to escape from them and fled away from the spot. Based upon the aforesaid incident, the prosecutrix has lodged a report immediately on the next day morning at 10.30 a.m based upon which, offence has been registered against the Applicant.
Priya
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the applicant is entitled to regular bail pursuant to Section 439 Cr.P.C. in a case involving sections 354 and 456 IPC.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Ramesh Mahilane
State Of Chhattisgarh
Sanjay Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
