Arun Kumar Yadav v. State of Chhattisgarh
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed an application marked as withdrawn with liberty to revive on examination of witnesses.
The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed an application marked as withdrawn with liberty to revive on examination of witnesses.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR M.Cr.C. No. 2784 of 2018
Arun Kumar Yadav S/o Rajendra Bahadur Aged About 24 Years R/o- VillagePureshivdayal, Dadra, P.S.- Musafirkhana, District- Amethi (U.P.), Uttar Pradesh.
---- Applicant
Versus
State Of Chhattisgarh Through- Police Station- Saraipali, DistrictMahasamund, Chhattisgarh., District : Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh.
---- Respondent
For the Applicant : Shri A.D. Kuldeep, Advocate. For the Respondent/State : Ms. Smita Ghai, P.L.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant ORDER
06.08.2018
Sd/-
(Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant) Judge
Nimmi
Arun Kumar Yadav
State Of Chhattisgarh
Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court