Allowed

Ram Burka v. State of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh HC2 Jul 2018MCRC/2085/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court of Chhattisgarh allowed regular bail to the applicant Ram Burka under Section 439 Cr.P.C. He was arrested for offences related to child labour exploitation. The Court found he was falsely implicated, did not mainly exploit the laborers, and had no criminal antecedents.

What did the court decide?

Released on bail by furnishing a personal bond of Rs.25,000/- with one surety in like sum.

Ram Burka Vs State of Chhattisgarh — Bail and Remand | Chhattisgarh HC (2018)

¶1

-1-

¶2

NAFR

¶3

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

¶4

MCRC No. 2085 of 2018

¶5

Ram Burka S/o Shri Narsaiya, Aged About 28 Years, R/o- Village- Ilmidi Kasaram Para, P.S.- Ilmidi, District- Bijapur, Chhattisgarh., District : Bijapur, Chhattisgarh

¶6

---- Applicant

¶7

Versus

¶8

State Of Chhattisgarh Through- Station House Officer, Police StationIlmidi, District- Bijapur, Chhattisgarh., District : Bijapur, Chhattisgarh

¶9

----Non-applicant

¶10

For Applicant – Smt. Indira Tripathi, Advocate. For Non-applicant/State – Shri Ashok Swarnkar, Panel Lawyer.

¶11

Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant Order on Board

¶12

02-07-2018

¶13

Heard on the application filed under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C. This is first bail application before this Court filed by the applicant for grant of regular bail. The applicant has been arrested on 15-02-2018 in connection with Crime No.05/2016 registered at P.S. - Ilmidi, District- Bijapur, Chhattisgarh for the offence under Section 370/34 of IPC, Section 26 of the Child Labour Regulation Abolition Act, 1976 and Section 3 of Child Labour Prohibition Act, 1986.

¶14

2 . It is submitted on behalf of the applicant that the applicant has been falsely implicated in this case. None of the labourers said to have been exploited are minor and neither this applicant is the person who had exploited them. Charge sheet has been filed after completion of the investigation. Hence, it is prayed that the applicant may be granted regular bail.

¶15

3 . Learned counsel for the State/non-applicant opposes the application

¶16

and submits that the applicant had been instrumental in commission of these offences. Hence, he is not entitled for grant of bail.

¶17

Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the case diary.

¶18

-2-

¶19

Case of the prosecution is this, that Santosh Burka, Tirupati and a number of other persons are the persons who were being exploited for labour work by the contractor in a village of Andhra Pradesh. Complainant Rajkumar Denga filed a complaint in this regard and on that basis the FIR has been lodged. During investigation it was discovered that this applicant was the person who had mediated and had been instrumental in engaging the victims for their being exploited by the said contractor. Hence, this case.

¶20

Considered on the material present in the case diary. It appears that this applicant does not have any criminal antecedent and that charge sheet has been filed, further, he is not the person who has mainly exploited and has not paid the wages to the labourers. Hence, for these reasons, I am of this view that the application deserves to be allowed.

¶21

Consequently, this application filed by the applicant under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C. for grant of regular bail is hereby allowed. It is directed that the applicant shall be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.25,000/- with one surety in the like sum to the satisfaction of the concerned Court, for his appearance as and when directed.

¶22

Certified copy as per rules.

¶23

Sd/-

¶24

(Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant) Judge

¶25

Aadil

Ram Burka v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ram Burka v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Nanka Ekka Vs The State Of Chhattisgarh

Chaituram Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Dheja @ Ramdhan Badi Vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Leelaram Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Satyendra Singh Bhadouriya Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Mukesh Yadav Vs State of Chhattisgarh