Manoj Yadav v. Santosh Kumar Sahu and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
In an MCA appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act 1988, the High Court Bench accepted a compromise between parties. The court ordered the insurance respondent to pay additional compensation of Rs. 20,000 with interest.
What did the court decide?
Order the respondent insurance company to pay Rs. 20,000 as additional compensation plus 6% interest per annum.
What the court decided
y:!7iQiB QVtttS. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE_OF CHHATTISGARH
AT BILASPUR
M.A.(C.) No..rr-:'.0.7..../2014
APPELLANT (CLAIMANT) ...^^'i!-'--''.'~/i.i?..-'-""' .-"'.erf1-"" ^••"" iWi'2'" ..-•J' ^w'....-••""
_Manoj Yadav S/o Shri Jatiram
Yadav, aged about 32 years, R/o Village Raveli, Police Station Fingeshwar, District Gariyaband (C.G.)
Versus
RESPONDENTS :
Santosh Kumar Sahu S/o Parsuram Sahu aged about 23 years, R/o Village Borsi, Police Station Fingeshwar, District Gariyaband
(C.G.) (Driver of alleged vehicle TATA A.C.E. bearing registration No.
C.G.04-JC-4860)
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Manoj Yadav S/o Jatiram Yadav
- respondent
Santosh Kumar Sahu
- respondent
Uday Ram Sahu
- respondent
The New India Insurance Company Limited
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Chhattisgarh HC
- Decided on
- · December
- Registered
- Case no.
- MAC/584/2014
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court