Allowed

B. Amlu and Anr. v. Santosh Kumar Kaiwart and Ors.

Chhattisgarh HC8 Sept 2018MAC/410/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Chhattisgarh High Court Lok Adalat accepted an amicable compromise between appellants and respondents in an insurance claim dispute, directing the insurance company to pay an additional Rs. 1,25,000 as compensation with interest if not deposited within 60 days.

What did the court decide?

Revised award directing respondent No. 3 to pay additional compensation of Rs. 1,25,000 within 60 days with 6% annual interest thereafter.

B. Amlu and Anr. Vs Santosh Kumar… — Contract and Commercial Disputes | Chhattisgarh HC (2018)

¶1

¶2

CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT, BILASPUR

¶3

NATIONAL LOK ADALAT

¶4

Judge Lok Adalat : Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ram Prasanna Sharma Member Lok Adalat: Mr. (Dr). Nirmal Kumar Shukla, Sr. Advocate.

¶5

MAC No. 410 of 2014

¶6

B. Amlu W/o Late Krishna Rao Aged About 47 Years R/o Qtr. No. 1435/5, Railway Wireless Colony, P.S. Tarbahar, Tah. And Distt. Bilaspur C.G., Chhattisgarh

¶7

B. Shriniwas Rao S/o Late Krishna Rao Aged About 27 Years R/o Qtr. No. 1435/5, Railway Wireless Colony, P.S. Tarbahar, Tah. And Distt. Bilaspur C.G., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

¶8

---- Appellants

¶9

Versus

¶10

Santosh Kumar Kaiwart S/o Govindram Kaiwart Aged About 33 Years R/o Jaitpur, P.S. Masturi, Distt. Bilaspur C.G., Chhattisgarh

¶11

Salma Bano W/o Sajid Ebani R/o Mohalla Chandela Nagar, Ring Road No. 02, P.S. Civil Line, Distt. Bilaspur C.G., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

¶12

Bajaj Aliance Gen.Insu.Co. W/o Thru- Branch Manager, Office- 3rd Floor, Thru- Gurukripa Tower, In Front Of Icici Bank, Vyapar Vihar, Bilaspur C.G., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

¶13

---- Respondent

¶14

For Appellants : Mr. Vimlesh Bajpai, Advocate. For Respondent No.3/ : Mr. Sachin Singh Rajput, Advocate. Insurance Company

¶15

AWARD

¶16

( Passed on 8-9-2018)

¶17

The contesting parties to this appeal have amicably

¶18

settled/compromised the dispute which is subject matter of the appeal, voluntarily. We have also found that the terms and conditions of compromise/settlement arrived at between the contesting parties are just,

¶19

¶20

proper and legal. There is no legal impediment to compromise and hence are acceptable. We accordingly accept the compromise/settlement proposed by the parties and order that the respondent No.3/ India Insurance Company shall pay Rs.1,25,000/- (Rupees One lakh twenty-five thousand only) by way of compensation in addition to the amount awarded by the learned Tribunal to the appellants within 60 days from today, otherwise interest @ 6% per annum from today shall also be payable till its realization of the additional amount of compensation. The total enhanced amount of Rs.1,25,000/- will be transferred to the account of claimants/appellants through transfer of fund from the Tribunal.

¶21

A copy of the docket (compromise arrived at between the parties) be sent to the Claims Tribunal along with its record, if any, and a copy of the award passed today, forthwith.

¶22

Sd/Sd/-

¶23

(Ram Prasanna Sharma) (Dr. N.K. Shukla) Judge- Lok Adalat Member – Lok Adalat High Court of Chhattisgarh High Court of Chhattisgarh Bilaspur Bilaspur

B. Amlu and Anr. v. Santosh Kumar Kaiwart and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

B. Amlu and Anr. v. Santosh Kumar Kaiwart and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Lalu @ Lakhan Vs State of Chhattisgarh

State of Chhattisgarh Vs Ashok Kumar Chandra

Heera Prasad Satpathi Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Ramkumar Vs Virendra Singh

Smt.shashiprabha Verma Vs Rajendra Kumar Jain And Anr.

Dharamjeet Vs State of Chhattisgarh