Appeal against a restraint order is disposed of without substantive outcome on merits.
Mapped to dispose miscellaneous appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
MA No. 81 of 2017
---- Appellant
Versus
---- Respondent
For Appellant Shri Amrito Das, Advocate For Respondent Shri Sumesh Bajaj, Advocate
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ajay Kumar Tripathi, CJ Hon'ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra
Order on Board
Per Ajay Kumar Tripathi, CJ.
03/08/2018
2
be dropped. Court is informed that the report of the CJM, Raipur, has been received on or about 21-11-2017, but nothing further has been done keeping in mind the order of the Division Bench. We are of the opinion that any further action or follow up in relation to the direction issued by the learned Single Judge dated 26-7-2017, which is subject matter in appeal, would be required to be taken depending upon the findings of the CJM.
Sd/Sd/(Ajay Kumar Tripathi) (Prashant Kumar Mishra) Chief Justice Judge
Gowri
Mohanlal Dhangar
Raipur Development Authority
Ajay Kumar Tripathi
Prashant Kumar Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
