The High Court of Chhattisgarh allowed the appellant's prayer to withdraw the appeal due to corrections required in the memo. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
Prayer to withdraw appeal was allowed; appeal dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
FAM No. 191 of 2017
---- Appellant
Versus
---- Respondent
For Appellant : Shri S.K.Kushwaha, Advocate For Respondent : Shri Ajay Mishra, Advocate
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Hon'ble Shri Justice Gautam Chourdiya
Order On Board
17/09/2018
Heard.
Learned counsel for the appellant seeks to withdraw this appeal on the statement that there are several corrections required to be carried out in the memo of appeal.
We have perused.
Prayer is considered and allowed.
This appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty as prayed for.
Sd/Sd/- (Manindra Mohan Shrivastava) ( Gautam Chourdiya) Judge Judge
Deepti
Dharmudas Vadhavani
Smt. Pinki Vadhavani
Manindra Mohan Shrivastava
Gautam Chourdiya
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
