The High Court of Chhattisgarh, Bilaspur dismissed an appeal for want of prosecution due to the absence of counsel, noting any resulting limitation bar. The application for condonation of delay was also dismissed.
IA No.1 for condonation of delay dismissed; appeal dismissed as barred by limitation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
FA No. 545 of 2017
---- Petitioner
Versus
---- Respondents
None for appellant, even in the second round.
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA
Order On Board
05/02/2018
As there is no one to prosecute the appeal, the application (I.A.No.1) for condonation of delay in filing the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. Consequently, the appeal is also dismissed as barred by limitation.
SD/( Manindra Mohan Shrivastava ) Judge
Tumane
Hari Ram Nishad
Set Kumar
Madahw Nishad
Smt. Padhmavati
Smt. Champa Bai
State Of Chhattisgarh Through Collactor Raigarh
MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
