The Chhattisgarh High Court allowed criminal revisions regarding convictions under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, permitting parties to compound the offence and acquitting the applicant.
Criminal revisions allowed; applicant acquitted; order dated 15.12.2004 set aside.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Criminal Revision No. 639 of 2004
Jeevesh Associates, Prop. S.K. Nair, S/o. P.V. Nainan, Aged about 43 years, R/o. A-3, Central Bank Colony, Sector-6, Bhilai Nagar, P.S. Sector-6 Kotwali, Bhilai Nagar, District Durg (C.G.)
---- Applicant
Versus
Raunak Sales Agency, Prop Lalit Karnawat, S/o. Dulichand Karnawat, R/o. Wakil Complex, Indira Market, Durg, Tahsil and District Durg (C.G.)
---- Respondent
Along with
Criminal Revision No. 638 of 2004
Jeevesh Associates, Prop. S.K. Nair, S/o. P.V. Nainan, Aged about 43 years, R/o. A-3, Central Bank Colony, Sector-6, Bhilai Nagar, P.S. Sector-6 Kotwali, Bhilai Nagar, District Durg (C.G.)
---- Applicant
Versus
Raunak Sales Agency, Prop Lalit Karnawat, S/o. Dulichand Karnawat, R/o. Wakil Complex, Indira Market, Durg, Tahsil and District Durg (C.G.)
---- Respondent
–-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------For Applicant : Mr. Naveen Shukla, Advocate on behalf of Ms. Fouzia Mira, Advocate For Respondent : Mr. Amiyakant Tiwari, Advocate –-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hon'ble Smt. Justice Vimla Singh Kapoor
Order on Board on 11.12.2018
Since both the revision petitions arise out of the same order dated 15.12.2004, they are being disposed of by this common order.
2
JUDGE
Sd/- (Vimla Singh Kapoor)
Santosh
1 issue framed by the court
Whether parties can compound the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act given their agreement for amicable settlement.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
K.M. Inbrahim v. K.P. MohammedRelied on¶22
AIR 2010 SC 276 · Who else cites this
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Jeevesh Associates, Prop. S.K. Nair
Raunak Sales Agency, Prop Lalit Karnawat
Vimla Singh Kapoor
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
