8 . From the evidence of prosecutrix (PW-1) and her niece (PW2) it is manifest that on the date of incident when they were getting back after easing themselves, the accused/applicants met them on the way, took PW-1 to the thrashing field, and tried to outrage her modesty. PW-2, however, succeeded in making herself free from the clutches of the accused/applicants and disclosed happening to the villagers she came across. PW-4 who at the relevant time was present in the filed has also supported the case of the prosecution stating that when he was busy in his agricultural work, PW-2 came to him and disclosed the act of the accused/applicants. On this, when he went to the place of occurrence, prosecutrix (PW-1) was found stripped off and her cloths were in complete disarray. Seizure of lady footwear, one locket and string used for tying the underwear made under Ex.P4, as well as a worn and torn salwar and underwear seized under Ex.P-1 also supports the case of the prosecution. The evidence thus clearly spells out that the accused/applicants put wrongful restraint on the prosecutrix and her niece when they were returning from the filed after easing themselves. Seizure made
