Single judge order admitting Criminal Misc. Petition No. 251 of 2018 under Section 378(3) CrPC. Court condoned delay, granted leave to appeal, and registered the petition as a regular acquittal appeal.
Delay condoned; leave to appeal granted; petition registered as regular acquittal appeal for final hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Order Sheet
CRMP No. 251 of 2018
State Of Chhattisgarh Versus Peer Mohammad @ Baba
| 26/07/2018 | Shri Ravindra Agrawal, Government Advocate for the State. |
|---|---|
| Considering the fact that the record of the trial Court has been received, default as pointed out by the Office is overruled. |
|
| The present petition has been filed under Section 378(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of leave to appeal. |
|
| Heard on I.A. No.01/18, application seeking condonation of delay in filing the present petition. For the reasons mentioned in the application, the same is allowed and delay in filing the CRMP is condoned. Also heard on admission. Petition being arguable isadmittedfor consideration. Leave as prayed for is granted. |
|
| Let this CRMP be registered as regular Acquittal Appeal. After registration of regular appeal, issue notice to the respondents on payment of process fee as per rules making the same returnable within 12 weeks. List this Acquittal Appeal for final hearing in due course. |
In the meanwhile, Registry to prepare paper book.
Sd/Sd/(Pritinker Diwaker) (Gautam Chourdiya) Judge Judge
Akhilesh
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to condone the delay in filing the acquittal appeal
Whether to allow leave to appeal
1 provisions across 1 enactments
State Of Chhattisgarh
Peer Mohammad @ Baba
Gautam Chourdiya
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
