Dismissed
Neha Roy v. State Of Chhattisgarh
Chhattisgarh HCCRMP/1577/2017
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Dismissed for want of prosecution due to non-representation of the petitioner.
What the court decided
AI extract
Dismissed for want of prosecution due to non-representation of the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
CRMP No. 1576 of 2017
---- Respondents
For Petitioner – None.
For Respondent No.1/State – Shri Avinash K. Mishra, Panel Lawyer. For Respondent No.2 – Shri Abhishek Agrawal and Shri Amrito Das, Advocates.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant Order on Board
11-12-2018
no other option but to dismiss these petitions for want of prosecution.
Sd/-
(Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant) Judge
Aadil
Neha Roy
State Of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer, Mahila Thana, Bilaspur
Smt. Nirmala Prasad
Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court