8. The prosecutrix (PW1) has stated that on the date of incident, in the evening hours, she was at her home. The Appellant took her towards jungle saying that they will roam there. There he committed sexual intercourse with her. Thereafter, he left her at the house of one person. Next day, in the morning, when she was returning towards her home, her brother Sonu (PW3) met her on the way. She told him about the incident. Thereafter, she lodged First Information Report (Ex.P1). She has further stated that her parents have expired. She was residing with her 3 brothers. During cross-examination, in paragraph 7, she has stated that when the Appellant was taking her away, many houses fell on the way and the way was an open way and remained busy for 24 hours. In paragraph 8 of her cross-examination, she has further stated that she does not know the name of the person in whose house the Appellant had left her. She has further stated that one woman was also present in that house, but she had not told about the incident to any of the two persons. She has further stated that next day, her brother met her on the way. She did not tell him about the incident on the way. She told him about the incident after her return to home. In paragraph 9, she has stated that they basically belong to Allahabad (Uttar Pradesh) and her brothers wanted her to send Allahabad, but she did not want to go there.
