14.In the light of the aforesaid principles, the statement of the prosecutrix who is examined as PW-4, wherein she has narrated that when she went to answer nature's call, the appellant caught hold of her hand and took her forcefully in a truck to some other place, thereafter, they went to village wherein she was subjected to forceful sexual intercourse. The porsecutrix has further stated that thereafter she went to some relatives place of the appellant, wherein she stayed for 2-4 days, thereafter also she went to village Pedikapa, thereafter, she went to village Lava, where also they stayed for 2-3 days and thereafter they came back to their own village and she stayed there for 2 days. In the cross-examination, she was confronted with the statement under Section 161 Cr.P.C., which is marked as Ex. D1. Perusal of the statement under Section 161 Cr.P.C. (Ex. D1), she has stated that she went to the house of Dulari, wherein she met Gita Bai and stayed there. Thereafter, the villagers accumulated and started shouting that the prosecutrix is staying in the house of the appellant as Dulari is the sister of the appellant. Subsequently, the Panchayat was held in the village and it was deliberated that the prosecutrix had an illicit relations with the appellant. Subsequently, in the night, the appellant told that their names have been maligned, as such in order to avoid that, they went to marry and thereafter fled away and subsequently, they went to different village and came to Bilaspur, wherein she stayed in a house and thereafter in the Radha Krishna Mandir vermilion was put on her forehead hair partings. She further admitted that in the Panchayat, it was told by the appellant that the
